<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally! Font Smoothing Over RDP/ICA on Server 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/2008/07/08/finally-font-smoothing-over-rdpica-on-server-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/2008/07/08/finally-font-smoothing-over-rdpica-on-server-2003/</link>
	<description>Helge Klein on Windows, User Profiles, Citrix and other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:44:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Dar3</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/2008/07/08/finally-font-smoothing-over-rdpica-on-server-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-12685</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Dar3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/?p=41#comment-12685</guid>
		<description>I\&#039;d say the main reason is that most users don\&#039;t know about the feature although it might be enabled by default on their desktops (i\&#039;m talking about standard Font Smoothing not necessarily ClearType) and second is it\&#039;s because most TS / Citrix admins consider it unecessary / adverse effects on network bandwith (this is what I got from my IT team) and they want to avoid potential problems. I\&#039;d say this should always be there and somehow disable it in the RDP/Citrix client if the network latency is too high, rather than just have it disabled for all, but maybe that\&#039;s just me, being a user and developer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I\&#8217;d say the main reason is that most users don\&#8217;t know about the feature although it might be enabled by default on their desktops (i\&#8217;m talking about standard Font Smoothing not necessarily ClearType) and second is it\&#8217;s because most TS / Citrix admins consider it unecessary / adverse effects on network bandwith (this is what I got from my IT team) and they want to avoid potential problems. I\&#8217;d say this should always be there and somehow disable it in the RDP/Citrix client if the network latency is too high, rather than just have it disabled for all, but maybe that\&#8217;s just me, being a user and developer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Links Tagged With "rdp" - JabberTags</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/2008/07/08/finally-font-smoothing-over-rdpica-on-server-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Links Tagged With "rdp" - JabberTags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/?p=41#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>[...] public links &gt;&gt; rdp   RDP Client for iPhone Saved by fuzzball334 on Thu 09-10-2008   Finally! Font Smoothing Over RDP/ICA on Server 2003 Saved by jezcat123 on Wed 08-10-2008   Findout who is logged on to a server Saved by herrsergio on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] public links &gt;&gt; rdp   RDP Client for iPhone Saved by fuzzball334 on Thu 09-10-2008   Finally! Font Smoothing Over RDP/ICA on Server 2003 Saved by jezcat123 on Wed 08-10-2008   Findout who is logged on to a server Saved by herrsergio on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helge Klein &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to Configure Font Smoothing on Presentation Server and XenApp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/2008/07/08/finally-font-smoothing-over-rdpica-on-server-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>Helge Klein &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to Configure Font Smoothing on Presentation Server and XenApp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/?p=41#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>[...] the release of the hotfixes KB946633 and PSE450R02W2K3037 ClearType font smoothing is finally available on both the current and the upcoming Citrix flagship products Presentation Server 4.5 and XenApp [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the release of the hotfixes KB946633 and PSE450R02W2K3037 ClearType font smoothing is finally available on both the current and the upcoming Citrix flagship products Presentation Server 4.5 and XenApp [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/2008/07/08/finally-font-smoothing-over-rdpica-on-server-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Helge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/?p=41#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>Spoonman,

I agree: the main reason ClearType font smoothing was disabled was probably that MS thought that LCD screens were not widely used yet. At least I cannot think of any other reason. However, around 2005 I worked in a relatively large (though not as large as yours) project upgrading existing farms to PS 4 and at the same time replacing fat clients + CRTs with thin clients + LCDs. I must say the customer was quite disappointed when I told him that ClearType just does not work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spoonman,</p>
<p>I agree: the main reason ClearType font smoothing was disabled was probably that MS thought that LCD screens were not widely used yet. At least I cannot think of any other reason. However, around 2005 I worked in a relatively large (though not as large as yours) project upgrading existing farms to PS 4 and at the same time replacing fat clients + CRTs with thin clients + LCDs. I must say the customer was quite disappointed when I told him that ClearType just does not work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spoonman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/2008/07/08/finally-font-smoothing-over-rdpica-on-server-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1027</link>
		<dc:creator>Spoonman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/?p=41#comment-1027</guid>
		<description>Well, I wouldn&#039;t say it was one of the MOST important features.  In 8 years of being a Citrix administrator, I&#039;ve only recently just received my request to enable it ever (ironically, the day before the patch was released, so I almost lied when I told them it wasn&#039;t possible).  We have over 14,000 users on our farm, and at my previous employer we had over 9,000.  I&#039;m sure if it was a real issue, someone would&#039;ve noticed it before now.  The only reason it&#039;s become an issue for us now is we&#039;re releasing a new version of our in-house written application that we are now providing to our customers via Citrix and so Sales is involved.  :)

I would think the main reason they disabled it was because not everyone&#039;s using flat panels yet.  IMO, anti-aliased fonts look worse on CRTs, so by enabling it for your Citrix-hosted apps, you&#039;d be doing your users a disservice.  And, as you pointed out in another article, there is a slight performance hit on bandwidth.  I wonder how much of a difference it makes processor-wise, too?  I guess we&#039;ll find out once we enable it on our 150 user machines. :)

Thanks for the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I wouldn&#8217;t say it was one of the MOST important features.  In 8 years of being a Citrix administrator, I&#8217;ve only recently just received my request to enable it ever (ironically, the day before the patch was released, so I almost lied when I told them it wasn&#8217;t possible).  We have over 14,000 users on our farm, and at my previous employer we had over 9,000.  I&#8217;m sure if it was a real issue, someone would&#8217;ve noticed it before now.  The only reason it&#8217;s become an issue for us now is we&#8217;re releasing a new version of our in-house written application that we are now providing to our customers via Citrix and so Sales is involved.  :)</p>
<p>I would think the main reason they disabled it was because not everyone&#8217;s using flat panels yet.  IMO, anti-aliased fonts look worse on CRTs, so by enabling it for your Citrix-hosted apps, you&#8217;d be doing your users a disservice.  And, as you pointed out in another article, there is a slight performance hit on bandwidth.  I wonder how much of a difference it makes processor-wise, too?  I guess we&#8217;ll find out once we enable it on our 150 user machines. :)</p>
<p>Thanks for the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Crevier's Blog : Font Smoothing with Remote Desktop and Windows Server 2003</title>
		<link>http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/2008/07/08/finally-font-smoothing-over-rdpica-on-server-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Crevier's Blog : Font Smoothing with Remote Desktop and Windows Server 2003</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.sepago.de/helge/?p=41#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>[...] Helge Klein » Blog Archive » Finally! Font Smoothing Over RDP/ICA on Server 2003   Published Friday, July 11, 2008 8:42 PM by dancre [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Helge Klein » Blog Archive » Finally! Font Smoothing Over RDP/ICA on Server 2003   Published Friday, July 11, 2008 8:42 PM by dancre [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
