Who Needs Aero Glass Remoting? Although It's Cool!

by Nicholas Dille on 07/29/2009 | 5 Comments | 21,855 Views

The Microsoft Remote Desktop Services Team has release a very intriguing article about Aero Glass Remoting with Windows Server 2008 R2. Being a tech guy, I have tested this on a development system and I must say that I am officially impressed.

In the last years, I joined the ranks of those migrating to Windows Vista and, later, to Windows 7 RC not only because it was the next incarnation of the Windows operating system but due to Aero which is part of the Home Premium (or higher) editions.

But soon after the initial euphoria subsided, I asked myself who would actually profit from Aero Glass with or without remoting it? Consumers apparently are but this is not my business.

In a terminal server environment, you definitely do not want a large percentage of fat clients as they are to expensive for a centralized environment. So you go down the thin client road. But apparently, Linux-based thin clients will not do the trick as Aero Glass – and especially remoting it – is reserved for Windows-based thin clients.

Let's have a closer look and Windows-based thin clients. Those based on Windows XP Embedded are obviously antique – Aero Glass was introduced in Windows Vista. After some research, I found Windows Vista Enterprise / Ultimate for Embedded Systems. So, Microsoft apparently planned for thin clients to be based on modern Windows clients. But as customers did not catch on, the editions suitable for thin clients were born dead. In Oktober 2008, Microsoft announced Windows 7 for Embedded Systems.

But what we will see in the end is the Windows Embedded Standard 2009. It is based on Windows Vista or Windows 7 and even allows for Windows-based thin clients with local support for Aero Glass. These systems are also prepared for Aero Glass remoting with Windows Server 2008 R2.

But Again: Who needs Aero Glass Remoting?

To be frank with you, nobody really needs it – as painful as this may sound. But still the masses are drooling for cool graphics and user interfaces – that's why Mac OS X is so successful. Users will expect Aero Glass to be available at work just as it is on their shiny notebooks at home. Being able to offer it in a terminal server environment is the logical step toward a modern workplace.

But even Linux-based thin clients show the new looks of Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 without being capable of locally rendering Aero Glass. It just looks less cool. Either way, users will be able to get the new looks of Windows.

But … When?

This is the hardest question of all. Customers will have to adopt to Windows Server 2008 R2. As this is the first operating system to be released 64-bit only, they will have to migrate to 64-bit which is not done on a weekend but rather a project on its own.

In addition, thin client vendors will have to offer new devices or firmware revisions based on the Windows Embedded Standard 2009 including Aero Glass. By the way, such devices require a graphics card with the appropriate performance index.

As you can see, there are several steps to be taken first. Until the era of Aero Glass remoting dawns on us, we will have to take comfort in these shiny demos.

References

There are some very interesting blogs about embedded Windows systems: Windows Embedded, Oliver Bloch, and Mike Hall.

+++ Your opportunity +++ Use Profile Migrator 2, the new sepago product that makes migrating user personalities between different platforms a breeze.! Download your free version now!

5 responses for "Who Needs Aero Glass Remoting? Although It's Cool!"

Hi, The question can be put

Hi,
The question can be put also as "who need Windows Embedded thin clients"? They are expensive, difficult to maintain, need security software AV/FW, etc. Customers who go for thin clients usually do for cost reasons, so somewhat it is always hard to sell a 500 euro thin client. You might as well keep your PC.

Windows Embedded Standard is

Windows Embedded Standard is not based on Vista or Win7. It is XP Embedded SP3 with a bunch of .net components added.

Okan, I have deliberately

Okan,

I have deliberately not dived into the discussion of different thin client platforms. There are customers with requirements that call for Windows-based thin clients but they are rather rare.

Regards,
Nicholas

Matt, is that a fact? It has

Matt,

is that a fact? It has been incredibly hard to come up with information about the Windows Embedded Standard 2009. I have even signed up for a demo lab to make sure of this.

Do you have a page at Microsoft for reference? I'd be honestly interested in further information about the plans of Windows 7-based thin clients and the Windows Embedded Standard 2009 as well as its features.

Regards,
Nicholas

I need to correct myself.

I need to correct myself. Microsoft has just announced the CTP of the Windows Embedded Standard 2011 which will be based on Windows 7: http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/09/01/windows-embedded-standard-2011-....

This version of the embedded standard includes support for Aero and allows for thin clients to be built supporting Aero Glass remoting.

Regards,
Nicholas

Add Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
reload image
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Microsoft Competence Blog

Application Infrastructure with Microsoft Technologies is an important focus at sepago. Our consultants have many years of experience in projects, are always open to new technologies and want a deep dive into it. The competence blog articles are providing this information.

RSS-FeedSubscribe articles

 

About the author

Nicholas Dille's picture
Nicholas Dille
Head of Technology and Innovation
Blogs about Centralized computing, virtualization and performance monitoring

All articles